A comparison of three transpiration models in a tomato crop grown under greenhouse conditions

Authors

  • Jaime Rivera-Zamarripa Colegio de Posgraduados

Keywords:

Solanum lycopersicum L., Boulard- Wang, Penman-Monteith, Stanghellini

Abstract

Transpiration is a physiological process, which uses almost all the water absorbed by plants. In this investigation, the transpiration rate was estimated using three models Penman-Monteith, Stanghellini, and Boulard-Wang. Observed data were obtained from two experiments on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) grown under greenhouse conditions and hydroponics. The first experiment was conducted during 13 days of June, 2008 at the University of Querétaro. The second experiment lasted 18 days during October and November, 2008, at the University of Chapingo. At both sites, transpiration rates in a tomato crop were measured using a weight lysimeter. Input variables of each model were recorded simultaneously and the leaf area index (LAI) of the crop was measured. In the summer at the Queretaro site, the model Boulard- Wang with a LAI = 1 had the best model performance according to both the model efficiency (EF = 0.72) and agreement index (AI = 0.92) statistics. On the other hand, at the Chapingo site, with lower air temperature, and a LAI = 2 the Sthangellini model had the best model performance obtaining an EF = 0.84 and AI = 0.96. The best model performance of Boulard-Wang model for the Queretaro data was mainly attributed to meteorological conditions (higher wind speed) outside the greenhouse, which reflected the high energy load (microadvection) inside the greenhouse. The sparse crop canopy (LAI = 1) was the main cause of the microadvection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Rivera-Zamarripa, J. (2013). A comparison of three transpiration models in a tomato crop grown under greenhouse conditions. REVISTA TERRA LATINOAMERICANA, 31(1), 9–21. Retrieved from https://terralatinoamericana.org.mx/index.php/terra/article/view/1031

Issue

Section

Scientific Papers

Metrics

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
0
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
46%
33%
Days to publication 
1231
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
Terra Latinoamericana